16.1
Rating Queries with
Multiple Interpretations and Intents
Some
queries really only have one meaning. Consider the query [iphone], English
(US). There may be different user intents for this query (research iPhones, buy
an iPhone, go to the iPhone page on Apple’s website), but all users are
basically referring to the same thing: the phone made by Apple, Inc.
Some
queries truly have different possible meanings. Consider the query [apple],
English (US). Some users may want to find more information on the computer
brand or the fruit. We refer to these different meanings as query
interpretations.
When
giving Needs Met ratings for results involving different query interpretations,
think about how likely the query interpretation is and how helpful the result
is.
·
A very helpful result for a dominant interpretation should be rated Highly Meets, because it is very helpful for many or most
users. Some queries with a dominant
interpretation have a FullyM result.
·
A very helpful result for a common interpretation may be Highly
Meets or Moderately Meets,
depending on how likely the interpretation is.
·
A very helpful result for a very minor interpretation may be Slightly
Meets or lower because few users may be interested in that interpretation.
·
There are some interpretations which are so unlikely that
results should be rated FailsM. We
call these “no
chance” interpretations.
16.2
Rating Queries with
Both Website and Visit-in-Person Intent
Some queries have two possible
strong intents:
1. Go to the website intent: in order to, for example, find out information, buy something
online, make a reservation, schedule an appointment, interact with customer
support, or fulfill some other need that can be satisfied online
2.
Visit-in-person intent: user wants to visit
the store, business, etc. in person
We
know the user intent is to accomplish one or the other, but it is unclear which
one the user wants. For these queries, result blocks that only satisfy one
intent should NOT get a Fully Meets rating.
|
Query, User Location, User Intent
|
Result Block and LP
|
Needs Met Rating and Explanation
|
|
Query: [target]
User
Location:
Jacksonville, Florida
User Intent: There are two possible
strong user intents: most users probably want to visit a nearby Target
location or go to the website to shop online, research products, find prices,
etc.
|
![]() |
The result block shows three popular Target
locations in Jacksonville, with information that is especially helpful for
users who want to visit the store. This fulfills the user intent to find a
nearby Target location.
|
![]() |
The result is very
satisfying and fulfills the user intent to shop online or otherwise use the
website.
|
|
Query, User Location, User Intent
|
Result Block and LP
|
Needs Met Rating and Explanation
|
|
Query: [dmv]
User
Location:
Belmont, California
User Intent: There are two possible
strong user intents: most users
probably want to visit a nearby DMV location or go to the DMW website to
renew a license, pay a fee, find some information, etc.
|
![]() |
The result block shows two nearby DMV locations,
with information that is especially helpful for users who want to visit the
locations. This fulfills the user intent to find a nearby DMV location.
|
![]() |
The result is very
satisfying and fulfills the user intent to find information or otherwise use
the website (e.g., to review a license, pay a fee).
|
|
|
Query: [citibank]
User
Location: Palo
Alto, California
User Intent: There are two possible
strong user intents: most users probably want to visit a nearby Citibank
location or go to the website to bank online.
|
![]() |
The result block shows three nearby Citibank
locations in the user location of Palo Alto. The information is especially
helpful for users who want to visit the bank. This fulfills the user intent
to find a nearby Citibank location.
|
![]() |
The result is very
satisfying and fulfills the user intent to do online banking or otherwise use
the website.
|
17.0 Specificity
of Queries and Landing Pages
Some queries are very general and
some queries are specific. Here are some examples that compare levels of
specificity of English (US) queries:
|
Query
|
More Specific
Query
|
Even More
Specific Query
|
|
[chair]
|
[dining room chair]
|
[ikea “henriksdal” highback upholstered chair]
|
|
[library]
|
[harvard library]
|
[harvard anthropology library]
|
|
[interview questions]
|
[interview questions for teachers]
|
[practice interview questions used for teach for
america]
|
|
[restaurants]
|
[chinese restaurants]
|
[takeout chinese restaurants in downtown Austin]
|
|
[coffee shops]
|
[starbucks]
|
[red rock coffee mountain view]
|
Results for
specific queries are easier to rate on the Needs Met scale because we know more
about what the user is looking for. Giving a Needs Met rating for results for
general queries can be difficult. As always, your rating is based on how
helpful the result is for the query, not the specificity fit.
When the query is a broad
category, such as [cafes] [restaurants] [hotels] [books] [tourist attractions
in paris] etc., popular and prominent examples may be considered very helpful.
Please do web research to help you understand what is popular and prominent in
different locations.
|
Query, User Location, User Intent
|
Result Block
and LP, E-A-T Rating, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
|
Query: [credit cards]
User
Location:
Phoenix, Arizona
User Intent: Users are probably looking
to sign up for a credit card online, or want to research credit cards before
signing up.
|
![]() |
Even though there are many
options, a page for an individual company that offers different cards could
be very helpful.
E-A-T:
Visa is a well-known credit card company with a good reputation.
Needs Met: This LP is more specific
than the query, but it would still be helpful for many or most users because
Visa is a popular credit card company.
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
Even though there are many
options, a page for an individual company that offers different cards could
be very helpful.
E-A-T:
Discover is a well-known company that offers services for credit cards,
banking, and loans, and has a good reputation.
Needs Met: This LP is more specific
than the query, but it would still be helpful for many or most users because
Discover is a popular credit card company.
|
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This page offers a list of
top credit cards in a variety of categories.
E-A-T: This website helps
consumers make money decisions. It has a good reputation and has been
recommended by CNNMoney and The New York Times.
Needs Met: This LP fits the query.
It would be helpful for most users.
|
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This page describes a
credit card that requires union membership.
E-A-T:
This company is an expert on its own credit card, which is issued by HSBC
Bank, a well-known financial services organization.
Needs Met: Since the credit card
requires union membership, the page would be helpful for some users.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Query, User Location, User Intent
|
Result Block and LP, E-A-T Rating, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
|
Query: [hotels]
User
Location:
Jacksonville, Florida
User Intent: Users are probably planning
a trip, but this query is very general and vague.
|
![]() |
This is a popular travel aggregator website, and
the hotel page on the site can help users find hotels in the U.S. Users can
read reviews, compare hotels, or make a reservation.
E-A-T: Orbitz is a popular
website with a good reputation.
Needs Met: This LP fits the query.
It would be very helpful for most users.
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This is a very popular
hotel chain with hotels available in the majority of the
U.S. at many different price points.
Even though the list of possible hotel chains is
long, the homepage of an individual chain that offers different prices,
features, and location options could be very helpful.
E-A-T: The Marriott website
gives information on Marriott hotels, a popular chain of hotels. Marriott is
an expert on Marriott hotels and the information is highly authoritative.
Needs Met: This LP is more specific
than the query, but it would still be helpful for many or most users because
the Marriott is a popular chain of hotels.
|
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This is the webpage of the Marriott Courtyard
hotel in Emeryville, California.
E-A-T: The Marriott website
gives information on Marriott hotels, a popular chain of hotels. This page is
professional, well designed, and functions well. Marriott has a good
reputation and is an expert on Marriott hotels, making the information on
this page highly authoritative.
Needs Met: The LP is too specific
for the query, but this is a well-known brand and users can navigate to other
Marriott hotels from this page. Few users would find this page helpful.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Query, User Location, User Intent
|
Result Block and LP, E-A-T Rating, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
|
Query: [target]
User
Location:
Jacksonville, Florida
User Intent: Go to target.com or find a
nearby Target store.
|
![]() |
Needs Met: The result block shows three popular Target locations in
Jacksonville, with information that is especially helpful for users who want
to visit the store.
|
|
|
No E-A-T rating required
for this block
|
|
||
![]() |
The LP is the Target
website.
E-A-T:
The Target website offers many different categories of products to buy
online, as well as coupons, store information, and more topics that they are
the experts on.
Needs Met: The result is very
satisfying for mobile users that want to go to the website.
|
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
The LP is the “store
locator” page on the Target website.
E-A-T: Target is the expert
about where its stores are located. This page is the most authoritative page
on this topic.
Needs Met: The LP is more specific than the query, but many or most users
would be interested in this page.
|
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
The LP is the “electronics”
page on the Target website.
E-A-T: Target has a good
reputation, but is not an expert or authority on much of what it sells.
Needs Met: The LP is more specific than the query, but many or most users
would be interested in this page.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Query, User Location, User Intent
|
Result Block and LP, E-A-T Rating, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
|
Query: [target]
User
Location:
Jacksonville, Florida
User Intent: Go to target.com or find a
nearby Target store.
|
![]() |
Needs Met: While this result block
has some helpful content, most people searching for Target are not looking
for the stock price or the names of the CEO and Founder. A rating of Slightly Meets to Slightly Meets+ is appropriate.
|
|
|
No E-A-T rating required
for this block
|
|
||
![]() |
The LP on the Target
website is for a specific type of women’s pants.
E-A-T: Target has a good
reputation, but is not an expert or authority on much of what it sells.
Needs Met: The LP is much more specific than the query and would be helpful
for very few users.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Query, User
Location, User Intent
|
Result Block and LP, E-A-T Rating, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
|
Query: [chicken recipes]
User
Location: Austin,
Texas
User Intent: Users probably want to make
a chicken dish and are looking for some recipes to choose from. Users
probably expect and want a list of recipes.
|
![]() |
This LP has many chicken
recipes (with reviews) on a popular recipe website.
E-A-T:
Food Network is a popular website with a good reputation for providing high
quality recipes and cooking information.
Needs Met: This LP fits the query.
It would be very helpful for most users.
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This LP has a single recipe
for chicken parmesan.
E-A-T:
Food Network is a popular website with a good reputation for providing high
quality recipes and cooking information.
Needs Met: This is a popular type of
chicken recipe on a popular website, but the LP is more specific than the
query. Some or few users would find this page helpful.
|
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This LP has over 25 recipes
for fried chicken, a popular chicken dish.
E-A-T: Allrecipes.com is a
popular website with a good reputation for providing high quality recipes
with lots of reviews.
Needs Met: Even though there are
over 25 different recipes on the LP, they are all for the same basic
dish. Therefore, this LP is also more
specific than the query. Some or few users would find this page helpful.
|
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This is a fake search page
for chicken recipes.
E-A-T: Ads should never disguise
themselves as the MC of the page. Pages with Ads that are designed to look
like MC should be considered deceptive, making this fake search
untrustworthy.
Needs Met: It should be rated FailsM as it would be helpful for no
users.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Query, User
Location, User Intent
|
Result Block and LP, E-A-T Rating, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
|
Query: [smithsonian air and space
museum store]
User
Location:
Washington, DC
User Intent: Go to the store website or
find information, such as opening hours, about the museum’s store in
Washington, DC.
|
![]() |
This LP is the official
website for the museum store.
E-A-T:
The museum is the expert on information about the store, including hours,
phone numbers, membership information, etc.
Needs Met: The result is very
satisfying for mobile users that want to go to the website.
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
Needs Met: While the result is about the museum, the hours, address, and
directions are the same as the museum store. This information is helpful for
users searching for the store.
|
||
|
No E-A-T rating required
for this block
|
|
||
![]() |
This LP has information
about how to volunteer at the museum.
E-A-T: The museum is the expert
on their own volunteer opportunities. This page is the most authoritative
page on this topic.
Needs Met: The LP is more specific
than the query and would be helpful for few users.
|
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
Needs Met: This is not the museum
requested in the query so the result Fails
to Meet the user intent.
|
||
|
No E-A-T rating required
for this block
|
|
||
18.0 Needs Met
Rating and Freshness
Some queries demand very recent
or “fresh” information. Users may be looking for “breaking news,” such as an
important event or natural disaster happening right now. Here are different
types of queries demanding current/recent results.
|
Type of Query
|
Example Queries
|
Explanation
|
|
“Breaking news” queries
|
[tornado], [tsunami]
|
Assume users need the
information right away.
Imagine someone who needs
immediate weather information
because a big storm is coming. Information about last year's weather would
not be helpful.
|
|
Recurring event queries, such as elections, sports
events, TV shows, conferences, etc.
|
[olympics], [american idol], [redsox schedule],
[tax forms], [elections]
|
Assume users are looking
for the most recent or current information about the event.
For example, if the
Olympics are happening right now, users searching [olympics] want information
about the current Olympics, not results from years ago. If the next Olympics
are a few months away, users are probably interested in the
upcoming
Olympics.
|
|
Current information queries
|
[population of paris], [amount of
u.s. debt], [airfare from ny to sfo], [next
federal holiday]
|
Assume users are looking
for the most current information, such as prices or airfare.
|
|
Product queries
|
[iphone], [toyota camry],
[windows operating system]
|
Assume users are looking
for information about the most recent model/version for these product
queries.
|
When a query demands recent
content, only pages with current, recent, or updated content should get high
Needs Met ratings. For these queries, pages about past events, old product
models and prices, outdated information, etc. are not helpful. They should be
considered “stale” and given low Needs Met ratings. In some cases, stale
results are useless and should be rated FailsM.
For some queries, there may be
“newsy” or recent information user intent, as well as more “timeless”
information user intent. Users issuing queries for celebrities or politicians
may be interested in biographical information, or users may be looking for the
latest news or gossip.
Freshness is generally less of a
concern for E-A-T rating. “Stale” pages can have high E-A-T ratings. For example,
some highly reputable news websites maintain “archival” content. However,
unmaintained/abandoned “old” websites or unmaintained and inaccurate/misleading
content is a reason for a low E-A-T rating.
Note: The date the page was created may be different from when the
content was last updated or modified. When content is updated, the page will
sometimes show the date of the update, not the date the page was created. Some
websites always show the current date, regardless of when the content was last updated.
If you are curious about the content of a page, see here to
try the “Wayback Machine” on the Internet Archive. Not all pages are available,
but this tool may help you understand how some pages were created and how their
content has changed over time.
|
Query, User Location, User Intent
|
Result Block
and LP, E-A-T Rating, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
|
Query: [nasa mars landing]
User
Location: San
Francisco, California
User Intent: On the date this example
was written, NASA had just landed
the “Curiosity” rover on Mars. Most users are probably looking for breaking
news and pictures about the event.
|
![]() |
This LP has an article about the “Curiosity” rover
landing, published on the same day as the landing, which is the day this
example was written.
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This LP has an article about the launching of the
“Curiosity” rover, published nine months before its landing on Mars. The
content on this page would be considered stale for the query.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Query: [los angeles traffic]
User
Location: Los
Angeles, California
User Intent: Users are looking for current information about traffic
conditions in Los Angeles. Even pages about traffic conditions the day before
would be considered stale for the query.
|
![]() |
This LP shows traffic conditions in Los Angeles on
August 7, 2012, which is the day this example was written.
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This LP shows traffic conditions in Los Angeles on
August 6, 2012. It is stale and useless for the query even though it is only
one day old.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Query: [nobel peace prize winner]
User
Location: San
Diego, California
User Intent: Find the name of the most
recent winner of this prize. This is a Know
Simple query. At the time this
example was originally written, 2011 was the most recent year that the Noble
Peace Prize was awarded.
|
![]() |
This LP on the New York Times website has information
about the most recent winner of this prize, based on the date when this
example was written.
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This LP on the BBC website
has information about the 2006 winner of this prize. This page is stale for
the query.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Query, User Location, User Intent
|
Result Block
and LP, E-A-T Rating, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
|
Query: [arthritis]
User Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
User Intent: Users are looking for information about this disease.
Because there is ongoing research done on
treatments and cures for most diseases, users are probably looking for
authoritative, up-to-date information on arthritis.
|
![]() |
Medline Plus is an
authoritative website that regularly updates its content.
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This 2006 article would be
considered stale for this medical query.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Query: [when was franklin d
roosevelt born]
User
Location: Chicago,
Illinois
User Intent: Users want to find this
well understood fact.
|
![]() |
This LP has the information users are looking for.
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
We couldn’t find a stale page for this
query.
|
|
||
19.1
Misspelled and
Mistyped Queries and Results
19.2
Misspelled and
Mistyped Queries
You will notice that some queries
are misspelled or mistyped. Here are some examples of queries that are
obviously misspelled:
|
Misspelled
Query
|
Query
Interpretation
|
|
[federal expres], English (US)
|
The only reasonable query interpretation is the
company named Federal Express.
|
|
[new england patroits], English US)
|
The only reasonable interpretation is the NFL
football team.
|
|
[byonce knowles], English (US)
|
The only reasonable interpretation is the famous
singer/actress, Beyonce Knowles.
|
Some misspelled or mistyped
queries are more difficult to interpret. Use your judgment and do query
research.
For obviously misspelled or mistyped queries, you should base your
rating on user intent, not necessarily on exactly how the query has been
spelled or typed by the user.
For queries that are not obviously misspelled or mistyped,
you should respect the query as written,
and assume users are looking for results for the query as it is spelled.
19.3
Name Queries
Consider the query [john stuart],
English (US). There is a very famous Jon Stewart, the comedian and host of a
popular U.S. television show. However, we should not assume that the query
[john stuart] has been misspelled. There are many people named John Stuart. We
will respect the query as written and assume the user is looking for someone
named “John Stuart.”
|
Query, User Location, Possible User Intents
|
Result Block and LP, E-A-T Rating, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
|
Query: [micheal jordan], English (US)
User
Location: San
Francisco, California
User Intent: There are many people named
“Micheal Jordan.”
Helpful results for more prominent people named
Micheal Jordan should receive higher ratings than helpful results for less
prominent people named Micheal Jordan.
Because Michael Jordan is such a famous
athlete/celebrity, we will consider Michael Jordan to be a minor
interpretation.
|
![]() |
The page lists all members
of the LinkedIn site named “Micheal Jordan.” LinkedIn is a very popular
social networking website for professionals in the
U.S. This result would be very helpful for many or
most users trying to find information about someone named “Micheal Jordan.”
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
LinkedIn page for Micheal Jordan, a facilities services
professional in Atlanta, Georgia.
|
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
Michael Jordan’s player
profile page on the NBA basketball website.
|
||
|
|
|
||
20.0 Non-Fully
Meets Results for URL Queries
Raters sometimes ask the
question, “For a well-formed working URL query, are the only acceptable Needs
Met ratings for a result either Fully
Meets or Fails to Meet?” The answer is no. There can be other helpful results for URL
queries.
Some users issue URL queries to
find information about a website, such as reviews or recent news. We
recommended this to you as one method of reputation research in the PQ
guidelines. Real users do this too. Results which give reviews and reputation
information can be very helpful for a URL query.
However, websites that offer
usage statistics about a website are not usually helpful results for URL
queries. Most users aren’t interested in this kind of information.
|
Query, User
Location, User Intent
|
Result Block and LP, E-A-T Rating, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
|
Query:
[coldwatercreek.com]
User
Location: Palo
Alto, California
User Intent: Coldwater Creek is a
well-known
U.S. company that sells women’s clothing and
accessories online and in retail stores. Users may want to go to the website,
do research, or find more information on the company.
|
![]() |
This LP is the target of
the query.
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
Online coupon codes are very popular in the U.S. and this LP
(from a well-known coupon site) displays codes for online purchases on the
Coldwater Creek website.
Users may be interested in coupon codes and this
would be very helpful for those shopping online at coldwatercreek.com,
especially frequent shoppers.
|
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This LP (from a well-known review site) has
reviews of the coldwatercreek.com website. Users may be interested in reading
reviews when considering whether to make purchases at coldwatercreek.com,
especially new shoppers.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Query, User Location, User Intent
|
Result Block and LP, E-A-T Rating, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
|
Query:
[ratemyprofessors.com]
User
Location: Los
Angeles, California
User Intent: Go to www.ratemyprofessors.co m, a website where students can rate their college professors.
|
![]() |
This LP is the target of the query.
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This LP is a Huffington
Post article dated August 31, 2012 about ratemyprofessors.com. The article
was newly published when it was added to the guidelines. Some users might be interested in this
article.
|
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This LP is an article dated
April 17, 2006 about the ratemyprofessors.com website. Few or no users would
be interested in this outdated information.
|
||
|
|
|
||
21.0 Product
Queries: Action (Do) vs. Information (Know)
Intent
Some product queries, such as
[ipad reviews], have a clear information-seeking (Know) intent. Other product queries, such as [buy ipad], have a
clear purchase (Do) intent. And some
product queries, such as [ipad store.apple.com], have a clear navigation (Website) intent. However, most product
queries don’t obviously specify one type of intent.
Even though the ultimate goal may
be to purchase a product, many other activities may take place first:
researching the product (reviews, technical specifications), understanding the
options that are available (brands, models, pricing), viewing and considering
various options (browsing), etc.
Give high Needs Met ratings to
results that allow users to research, browse, and decide what to purchase.
Important: E-A-T ratings for product results need extra care and
attention.
Often, the results for product
queries are YMYL pages. Users need high quality information from authoritative
sources when researching products, especially when products are expensive or
represent a major investment/important life event (e.g., cars, washing
machines, computers, wedding gifts, baby products). When buying products, users
need websites they can trust: good reputation, extensive customer service
support, etc. Results for product queries may be important for both your money
and your life (YMYL)!
|
Query, User Location, User Intent
|
Result Block and LP, E-A-T Rating, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
|
Query: [high definition tv]
User
Location: Los
Angeles, California
User Intent: This query doesn’t specify
a size or brand of TV. Users are probably doing research before making a
purchase.
|
![]() |
This LP has comprehensive
information about different types of high definition TVs (plasma, LCD, LED),
as well as reviews about many specific models. The website is known for
having helpful reviews and information about
electronics.
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Query: [girl toddler jeans size 3T]
User
Location: Los
Angeles, California
User Intent: The query is very specific.
The user wants to browse and find an item to buy.
|
![]() |
This is a helpful page for
browsing and shopping for toddler girls jeans. There are many options for
jeans in size 3T. This is a high
quality store known for selling jeans.
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Query: [cufflinks]
User
Location: Los
Angeles, California
User Intent: Most users probably want to
find different cufflink styles and options to browse or purchase.
|
![]() |
This LP has a large
collection of cufflinks from a very reputable retailer. There are many
options and styles.
This is a good page for browsing. There are
helpful features at the top to choose styles, price ranges, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
||
22.1
Rating
Visit-in-Person Intent Queries
When there is a user location for
a visit-in-person intent query and a location has not been specified in the
query itself, such as [chinese restaurants] with a user location of Boston, MA, results in or near the user
location are the most helpful.
How close is “near”? The type of
business and/or entity should be taken into consideration when deciding if the
distance of the visit-in-person result is too far. For example, most people are
not willing to travel very far for a gas station, coffee shop, supermarket,
etc. Those are types of businesses that most users expect to find very nearby.
However, users might be willing
to travel a little farther for certain kinds of visit-in-person results:
doctors’ offices, libraries, specific types of restaurants, public facilities
like swimming pools, hiking trails in open spaces,
etc. Sometimes users may accept results that are
even farther away, such as a very specialized medical clinic.
In other words, when we say users
are looking for results “nearby,” the word “nearby” can mean different
distances for different queries. As
always, please use your judgment.
22.2
Examples Where User
Location Does (and Does Not) Matter
As previously mentioned, the user
location may not always change our understanding of the query and user
intent. Below is one example
where user location plays an important role, and two examples where user
location does not matter.
|
Query, User Location, User Intent
|
Result Block
and LP, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
Query: [minimum wage rate]
User Location: Wichita, Kansas
User Intent: Find out what the minimum
wage is. Different states in the
U.S. have different minimum wage rates. Users
might be interested in the minimum wage in their state and how it compares to
other places.
|
![]() |
This Special Content Result
Block displays the complete and correct answer prominently in the result
block, in a way that is easy for users on mobile devices to read.
Note: Assume that the result
shows current information for users.
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This is the official Kansas state website page on
minimum wage for Kansas.
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This LP has the minimum
wage rates for all states. It is on the official U.S. Department of Labor
website, which has high E-A-T on the topic, but it takes some work to find
the information specific to Kansas. On a mobile phone, you may want to select
the Hard to Use flag. Please use your judgment.
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This is the official California state website page
on minimum wage for California.
|
|
|
|
|
Query, User Location, User Intent
|
Result Block
and LP, Needs Met Rating
|
Explanation
|
|
Query: [pictures of kittens]
User
Location:
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
User Intent: Users are looking for
pictures of kittens. This is a non-visit- in-person intent
query. There is no obvious user intent to find
pictures of kittens in Pittsburgh. The user location plays no role in the
Needs Met rating.
|
![]() |
The LP is a page full of kitten pictures. The
result block has a nice assortment of pictures as well that would highly
satisfy users.
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This is a local listing of pets needing homes in
the Pittsburgh area. There are no
pictures of any pets directly on
this page and few pictures on the individual
listings.
|
|
|
|
||
|
Query: [google jobs]
User Location: Miami, Florida
User Intent: Users are looking for job
opportunities at Google.
|
![]() |
The user is looking for a job at Google and there
is no information in this result block that will help the user explore job
opportunities—it Fails to Meet the
user need.
|
|
|
||
![]() |
This is Google’s official page on careers and jobs
at Google, where users can search for currently open opportunities. This page
is exactly what the user is looking for—it Fully Meets the user need.
|
|
|
|
Part 4: Using the Evaluation Platform
23.0 Introduction
Welcome to the Evaluation
Platform! The Evaluation Platform is the system you will use to acquire and
rate tasks.
24.0 Accessing the
Evaluation Platform (EP)
25.0 Evaluation
Platform Screenshot
Here is a screenshot of the task
acquisition page on the Evaluation Platform. Please note that changes are
sometimes made to the appearance of pages on the EP, so it may not look exactly
as it appears here.
![]() |
The red
numbers represent the following:
1.
Tasks
This text shows that you are at the task acquisition page on the
Evaluation Platform.
2.
rater@gmail.com
Your Gmail account.
3.
Recent tasks
Click this link to revisit tasks completed in the last few minutes.
4.
Sign out
Click this link to end your rating session.
5.
Acquire if available
Click this link to acquire a new task.
6.
Experimental
This text indicates that there
is an Experimental task available. Please note there are other types of rating
tasks (e.g., Result Review, Side-by-Side). Sometimes there will be only one
task type available, but other times you may see more than one type displayed.
When there is more than one type displayed, you may choose the type you want to
acquire.
26.0 Needs Met Task Page Screenshot

The red
numbers represent the following:
Your Gmail account.
2.
Recent tasks
Click this link to revisit tasks completed
in the last few minutes.
3.
Sign out
Click this link to end your rating
session.
4.
Mobile
This text indicates that the
current task belongs to the Mobile property
type. Other properties you may rate include Web, Video, Image, etc.
5. Experimental
This text indicates that the
current task belongs to the Experimental project type. Other project types you
may rate include Result Review, Side-by-Side, etc.
6. Average Estimated
Time
This text indicates the average estimated
time for completion of the task.
7.
Instructions
Click this tab to view the
project-specific instructions. Some tasks display project-specific instructions
on the task page instead of behind the Instructions
tab.
8. Query
You should understand the query before
rating the task.
9. Locale
This refers to the task location and task
language associated with the query.
10. Report a Problem / Release this Task
Click this link to report a problem and/or
release the task.
11. User Location
This refers
to where the user is located when the query is issued. Note that if there is no
user location listed, there will be no user location-related map displayed in
the rating task. In this case, the task could still show a map if one of the
results has a response pin.
12. Response Pin
This is a marker for a visit-in-person
place.
13. Approximate User
Location
This area represents the approximate
location of the user when the query is issued.
14. Needs Met Rating
Slider
Use this rating slider to assign a Needs
Met rating.
15. Porn Flag
Assign this flag if it applies to the
result.
16. Foreign Language
Flag
Assign this flag if it applies to the
result.
17. Didn’t Load Flag
Assign this flag if it applies to the
result.
18. 
Hard
to Use Flag
Assign this flag if it applies to the result.
19. Comment
Use the result block comment box
to write comments that will be helpful to you when assigning ratings. Note: All
comments must be written in English.
20. Special Content Result Block
This result block shows content directly in the block.
21. Result with Response Pin
The response pin in this result indicates the location of the
corresponding response pin on the map.
22. Web Search Result
Block
Click the block to visit the landing page.
23. Dupe Confirmation
Checkbox
Check this box to confirm that you are done flagging duplicate
results.
24. Submit
Use this button to submit the task and continue rating.
25. Submit and Stop
Rating
Use this button to submit the task and stop rating.
26. Cancel
Use this button to cancel any ratings you have assigned in the task.
26.1
Understanding the User Location on the Task Page
While most tasks have a user
location listed below the query, the map can also help clarify where the user
was physically located when the query was issued and is more precise than the
user location listed below the query.

On the map,
the user location can be precise (blue dot) or approximated (blue rectangle).
Here are some examples of what you might see at the top of the task:|
A precise user location is
represented by a blue dot
|
Sometimes you will see a
shaded blue circle around the blue dot. The blue dot is user’s most likely
location, but it is possible they are located anywhere within the larger
shaded blue region.
|
|
The approximate user location is shown as a blue
rectangle on the map.
|
The map includes a response pin, which is a marker
for a visit-in- person result block in the task. If there are three
visit-in-person result blocks in the task, there should be three response
pins on the map.
|
27.0 Notes about
Using the Needs Met Rating Interface
Result blocks are sometimes slow to load: Before assigning any
ratings, please scan the task page to make sure that all result blocks with a
Needs Met rating slider have loaded. Please note that result blocks may be slow
to load and/or that the task page may need reloading if there are empty result
blocks. If the result blocks fail to load after refreshing a few times, please
release the task.
Sometimes a
side will not have any result blocks: If one side displays the message “This side did
not generate any results,” please do not release the task.
Do not refresh
the task page after assigning ratings: If you refresh the page after assigning ratings,
you will lose them and they will have to be entered again.
28.1
Using the “Report a
Problem / Release this Task” Button
You will report problems and release
tasks using the “Report a Problem / Release this Task” button on the rating
interface. This is what the “Report a
Problem / Release this Task” button looks like:
Clicking the red button
displays the following reporting and release options:
![]() |
Here are some examples for the
“lack expertise” and “technical problem” release categories.
Lack expertise: These queries require specialized knowledge and may
be difficult for some raters.
|
Query
|
General Query Topic
|
|
[cortisol secretion shows a blank pattern of
secretion]
|
Scientific query
|
|
[minecraft gun and vehicles 1.1 mod installer]
|
Gaming query
|
|
[python pandas index like matrix]
|
Technical query
|
Technical problem: These result blocks have question marks and
other characters where text should be.
![]() |
Note: Based on the number and/or
type of tasks that you release, you may be asked to provide additional details
about the reason for some of the releases.
29.1
Reporting Results
with Duplicate Landing Pages
In addition to assigning Needs
Met ratings to each result block, we would like you to tell us whether any
results are duplicates (dupes).
29.2
Pre-Identified Duplicates
Some duplicate results are
automatically detected and will be pre-identified for you. They will be
highlighted by a grey or green background, and annotated by either “Same as...” or “Dupe of...” text right below the slider and above the result block.
This is what these pre-identified
dupes look like:
![]() |
Please note:
·
Results annotated by “Dupe of...”
may be given different ratings/flags/comments.
·
Results annotated by “Same as…”
may not be given different
ratings/flags/comments. Their Needs Met and E-A-T ratings, flags, and comments
will be automatically transferred to each other.
·
You cannot un-check dupes that have been automatically detected and pre-identified.
29.3
Rater-Identified Duplicates
We would like your help
identifying duplicate results that have not been automatically detected. Please mark two results as dupes if they have
essentially the same content on the main landing page AND you would not want a
search engine to return both results for the query.
Please note that in this project dupe identification
is query-dependent.
·
Specific queries: For queries where the user
is looking for a specific piece of content (such as queries looking for song
lyrics, queries looking for a specific article, etc.), obtaining that piece of
content from different sites could
be helpful for users to verify the information, so they should not be rated as dupes.
·
Broad queries: If the query is broad,
then returning the same piece of content is not what the user is looking for,
and hence those results should be
flagged as dupes. Results may be considered dupes even if they have different
minor content on the page (such as different ads, images, or related links).
Please identify dupes both
within the same side and across sides. Even for cross-side results, you should
still ask yourself the question, “Would you want to see both results if they
were returned by the same search engine?”
Note: If two result blocks have very different types of content or
very different appearances, do not mark them as duplicates even if they have
the same landing page URL. For example, these two blocks should not be marked
as duplicates of each other.
![]() |
![]() |
||
Reporting Duplicate Results
When you notice that the results
in two or more result blocks are duplicates, please click on the Select Dupe link at the top of one of
the results. The current result (the result you clicked on) will be highlighted
in red at the top of the block.
![]() |
You can then check results that
are duplicates of the current result, and the checked results will be
highlighted in yellow. You must select
the “Dupe of…” button.
![]() |
The duplicate results that you
checked will be annotated by "Dupe
of..." text at the top of the block. After selecting all dupes, click
on the finish selecting dupes link
to return to the normal rating mode. The link’s name will change back to Select Dupes, and you will be able to
report other sets of dupes, if there are any. If you change your mind, you can
always un-check a result.
Dupes
QUERY: [choosing and installing a motorcycle battery]
URL 2: http://www.articlesbase.com/motorcycles-articles/choosing-and-installing-a-motorcycle-battery-47798.html Reason: Both of these results display
the same article (which also appears on many other pages on the web). The only
real difference between the landing pages are the Ads displayed around the
article. The query is broad enough that users would not benefit by search engines returning more than one of these
results.
Dupes
QUERY: [jason castro]
Reason: These two results have the same landing page, even though
the URLs are different. Users would not benefit
by search engines returning both results.
Not Dupes
QUERY: [material girl lyrics]
Reason: Even though both pages display the lyrics to the song
“Material Girl,” users would probably want to have the option to visit both
pages so that they could verify the accuracy of the lyrics. Users could benefit
by search engines returning more than one page with the lyrics to the song.
































































Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét